Implementing NIST AI RMF: Mapping (Part 2 of 4)

Brian Fending
Share:
Implementing NIST AI RMF: Mapping (Part 2 of 4)

The real AI governance crisis isn't the models you've formally approved, it's the ones you don't know exist. Organizations consistently underestimate their AI footprint by 3-5x when conducting systematic inventories, creating immediate compliance exposure and security risks.

Traditional IT asset management fails catastrophically for AI because vendors don't clearly disclose AI features. What gets sold as "enhanced analytics" or "intelligent automation" often includes machine learning models processing your data in ways that weren't part of the original contract review.

Shadow AI adoption compounds the problem. Marketing subscribes to AI writing platforms, sales deploys conversation intelligence software, finance adopts AI-powered forecasting tools, all without formal approval processes. Meanwhile, vendor updates quietly add AI functionality to existing systems.

The NIST MAP function transforms this chaos into strategic visibility through systematic discovery, categorization, and impact assessment. Organizations move from compliance theater to actionable intelligence about their actual AI landscape.

This is Part 2 of the four-part NIST AI RMF implementation series. Stop discovering AI applications during compliance audits. Start discovering them before they become problems.

Continue Reading

This article continues on my preferred publishing platforms. Choose your platform to read the full article: